Despite SOLIDWORKS®' numerous benefits, many users still like using AutoCAD® for several valid reasons. To start with, SOLIDWORKS® needs a lot of data to produce an effective 3D model. Sometimes, especially early in the design process, SOLIDWORKS® is unable to generate a functional 3D model due to a lack of information. AutoCAD®, on the other hand, offers more creative freedom when developing and altering early ideas and models. Additionally, design revisions may take longer to complete with a 3D model than with a 2D model due to the volume of data needed to build it. Larger projects where SOLIDWORKS®' automated updates save more time over time can make the extra effort invested worthwhile.
Although AutoCAD® has its 3D capabilities, unlike SOLIDWORKS®, drafters often utilize them to improve the preliminary design process rather than the finished product. AutoCAD® does, however, come with a few cutting-edge 3D capabilities, such as realistic materials, and lighting. AutoCAD® is available in a variety of versions, including AutoCAD® Electrical, AutoCAD® Mechanical, and AutoCAD® Architecture. These updated versions include improved, sector-specific tools that facilitate a more efficient design. Finally, distinct file formats are used by SOLIDWORKS® and AutoCAD®. Numerous different CAD software applications can read the.dwg file format that AutoCAD® utilizes. SOLIDWORKS® has a collection of file types, including .sldasm for assemblies and .sldprt for component files. Both software programs can read and export too many file types. This makes reading AutoCAD® files and vice versa in SOLIDWORKS® simple.
Both AutoCAD® and SOLIDWORKS® have advantages and disadvantages, and at various stages of the design process, each application is preferable. During the first phases of the product design process, many users feel that using AutoCAD® is the most efficient method to work. To build a preliminary design and divide it into the several necessary sub-assemblies, designers might utilize AutoCAD®. After that, the designer can give other project team members sub-assemblies. Based on the design criteria, these designers may then model the components in SOLIDWORKS®.
As the standard platform for all designers, AutoCAD®:
SOLIDWORKS® is a good choice for mechanical designs, but other fields have their 3D software, such as Revit for architects. Similar principles govern the design process for these sectors; users create the first design using AutoCAD® before transferring it to 3D software for thorough modeling. Almost everyone utilizes AutoCAD® at some point throughout the design process, even though each industry prefers its specialized 3D software. Because of this, AutoCAD® continues to have a sizable user base and is still the most widely used design tool today.
Both AutoCAD® and SOLIDWORKS® employ a separate file format due to their variances. While SOLIDWORKS® utilizes its own set of file extensions, including .sldprt for part files and .sldasm for assemblies, AutoCAD® uses the.dwg format. Both programs, like the majority of CAD applications, can import from and export to a wide range of file formats to make file sharing simple.
Inclusion of both:
As you can see, choosing the better software between AutoCAD® and SOLIDWORKS® is not an easy task. SOLIDWORKS® is more capable of mechanical design, whereas AutoCAD® is more adaptable for preliminary design. Both design software products have their advantages. Because of this, you'll see that the same design firms and even individuals utilize both AutoCAD® and SOLIDWORKS®. Both software suites should be accessible for many years to come.
Our Holoware Workstations are the perfect companion for SOLIDWORKS® & AutoCAD® to unlock design innovation and deliver better products faster. For more custom options for your unique goals and requirements, please contact us here.